Current:Home > BackU.S. House Hacks Away at Renewable Energy, Efficiency Programs-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
U.S. House Hacks Away at Renewable Energy, Efficiency Programs
View Date:2024-12-23 22:45:06
This story has been updated with the final House vote.
The U.S. House of Representatives brushed aside Democrats’ efforts to preserve federal funding for clean energy and energy efficiency as it voted to approve a large spending bill Thursday that would slash those programs by 45 percent while maintaining federal support for fossil energy research and development.
The GOP-led House tucked its $9 billion federal energy spending plan into its so-called “minibus” budget bill, a catch-all package to fund one-quarter of the federal government when the new fiscal year begins in October.
The bill, dubbed the “Making America Secure Again Act,” is a long way from final approval. The Senate still must vote on its own bills to fund the Pentagon, the Department of Energy, and Veterans Affairs, and then Congress must reach an overall budget deal.
But the House made clear its priorities for shifting the nation’s energy investments away from clean energy as it voted on more than 70 amendments. Although it didn’t go as far as President Donald Trump’s White House budget plan, which would have cut the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by 68 percent, the House was in sync with the administration’s plan for a dramatic retreat from spending on carbon-free technology for power and fuel.
In its biggest departure from the Trump administration’s energy budget proposal, the House voted to preserve funding for fossil energy research and development at current levels. The White House had sought a 55 percent cut in the Office of Fossil Energy Research and Development.
“Coal, natural gas and oil—fossil fuels—make up 81 percent of this nation’s energy consumption,” said Rep. David McKinley (R-W.Va.), sponsor of the amendment to restore fossil fuel research funding to the 2017 level of $668 million. “In reality, the entire world is going to be dependent on fossil fuels for years to come. Shouldn’t America’s goal be to develop the technologies so that we can utilize coal, natural gas and oil in the cleanest and most efficient way possible?”
Democrats proposed nine amendments, all swatted down by voice vote, to keep clean energy funding to current levels—by taking money out of the budgets for fossil energy, military or nuclear weapons spending.
“We should invest in our future for renewable energy and energy efficiency rather than throwing more money at the past and into nuclear weapons,” said Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo.) before his amendment was rejected. “Fossil fuel research is a dead end for America and our economy, for the clean air we need and clean water. … Regardless of how clean we make fossil fuel extraction, it’s never as clean, or more importantly, as sustainable as renewable energy, and it definitely won’t be as cheap.”
Cutting Clean Energy to Boost Fossil Fuels
The House ultimately set the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy’s budget at $1.12 billion—agreeing to about $500 million more than the White House sought. The office’s 2017 budget had been $2.069 billion.
Seven former heads of the office, both Democratic and Republican, had warned Congress in June that deep cuts to U.S. energy innovation would do “serious harm” to the nation’s energy future. The office has helped drive research in solar panels, LED lighting and electric vehicle batteries, among other clean energy and energy efficiency advances.
The House went along with the Trump administration’s request to eliminate the Advanced Research Programs Agency—Energy (ARPA-E), the seven-year-old incubator for high-impact, transformational energy technology, saving themselves $306 million. Senators on an energy appropriations subcommittee had called the elimination of ARPA-E a “short-sighted proposal” last week. Their energy package would increase funding for ARPA-E by 7 percent.
The House also approved numerous riders taking aim at specific clean energy programs. For example, the legislation would prohibit Energy Department funds from going to support the Cape Wind offshore wind energy project, even though that project currently is in limbo without the financing to proceed.
Shattering Light Bulb Standards
As in past spending bills approved under the GOP-led House, the legislation would prohibit the Energy Department from spending money to enforce the energy efficient light bulb standards that Congress voted to phase in a decade ago.
Andrew deLaski, executive director of the Appliance Standards Awareness Project, said it’s not clear what effect the light bulb rider will have, since so far, manufacturers have chosen to comply with the standards anyway. “Who knows if they will continue, especially if a low-cost competitor from overseas starts to undercut them on price?” he said.
The light bulb standards, if they continue to be complied with, are expected to save an estimated 1.5 trillion kilowatt-hours by 2030—enough power to meet the needs of every U.S. home for a year, worth around $195 billion at today’s average retail electricity price. The CO2 savings would top 700 million tons, according to deLaski’s group—equivalent to one year’s emissions from 204 coal power plants.
“You can’t save money by gutting programs that save money, yet that’s what the House is trying to do,” said Kateri Callahan, president of the Alliance to Save Energy, a coalition of environmental and industry groups that support energy efficiency policy. Callahan said her group supports the Senate version of the bill, which would set funding for the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy at $1.9 billion—about a 7 percent cut from the current spending level.
On to the Senate
The final shape of the 2018 budget won’t be known until after the Senate passes its version of the spending bills and House and Senate leaders sit down to reach a deal.
Because the House minibus bill surpasses budget limits that Congress set in 2011, it would trigger mandatory Defense Department cuts that the Senate is not likely to allow to go into effect.
The White House supported the House bill as “a strong step to fulfilling the president’s promise to put the safety of the American people first,” pointing especially to the $1.6 billion the House allocated to construction of a Mexico border wall.
On energy, the White House said Congress should go further to shift its energy priorities and reduce funding for later-stage development, commercialization, and deployment activities.
veryGood! (5725)
Related
- Kyle Richards Swears This Holiday Candle Is the Best Scent Ever and She Uses It All Year
- Miami rises as Florida, Florida State fall and previewing Texas-Michigan in this week's podcast
- Queen guitarist Brian May suffered minor stroke, lost 'control' in his arm
- Biden promotes administration’s rural electrification funding in Wisconsin
- Disruptions to Amtrak service continue after fire near tracks in New York City
- Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sues Bexar County over voter registration outreach effort
- Adele Pulls Hilarious Revenge Prank on Tabloids By Creating Her Own Newspaper
- Adele Pulls Hilarious Revenge Prank on Tabloids By Creating Her Own Newspaper
- Gun groups sue to overturn Maine’s new three-day waiting period to buy firearms
- Power outages could last weeks in affluent SoCal city plagued by landslides
Ranking
- Why Kathy Bates Decided Against Reconstruction Surgery After Double Mastectomy for Breast Cancer
- Mark Meadows asks judge to move Arizona’s fake elector case to federal court
- Website offers $1,000 for a 'Pumpkin Spice Pundit' to taste-test Trader Joe's fall items
- Jason Kelce Thinks This Moment With Taylor Swift's Cats Will Be Hilarious
- What Republicans are saying about Matt Gaetz’s nomination for attorney general
- A Minnesota man whose juvenile murder sentence was commuted is found guilty on gun and drug charges
- GameStop turns select locations into retro stores selling classic consoles
- Advocates seek rewrite of Missouri abortion-rights ballot measure language
Recommendation
-
Wisconsin agency issues first round of permits for Enbridge Line 5 reroute around reservation
-
Get 50% Off a Murad Mattifier That Minimizes Pores and Shine for 10 Hours, Plus $8.25 Ulta Deals
-
Keith Urban Describes Miley Cyrus' Voice as an Ashtray—But In a Good Way
-
'Survivor' Season 47 cast: Meet the 18 new castaways hoping to win $1 million in Fiji
-
Does the NFL have a special teams bias when hiring head coaches? History indicates it does
-
Blue Jackets players, GM try to make sense of tragedy after deaths of Johnny and Matthew Gaudreau
-
Bigger and Less Expensive: A Snapshot of U.S. Rooftop Solar Power and How It’s Changed
-
1000-Lb. Sisters’ Tammy Slaton Picks Up Sister Amy’s Kids After Her Arrest